Re: (idm) vvm/speedranch

From Heatsink
Sent Wed, Jun 3rd 1998, 18:19

-----Original Message-----
From: Luke Keenan <xxxxx@xxxxxxx-xxxxx.xx.xx>
To: xxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx <xxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Date: 03 June 1998 00:44
Subject: (idm) vvm/speedranch


>Map One: contaminated by technique - by members of this parish of
>course.  Theres a high standard throughout, and there's enjoyment to
>be had, but its all reminiscent/derivative of the well known. Its
>easily said, but I've heard aphex twin, and autechre, and they are
>difficult to improve upon. So why try?

Um...Stuart, help!!  I think this was a point Adam raised in his review,
that
some/most of the tracks were similar to or heavily-influenced by more well
known artists.  As I can only speak for myself and not the other guys on the
CD, I`ll say that I wasn`t trying to improve on any artist`s previous work,
but
rather to make *mine* the best it can be.  No-one can help or choose what
influences
they have, and while I`m not going to blatantly steal from another track,
I`ll
readily use techniques pioneered by others in my own tracks.  How original
is the Aphex Twin anyway?  Not very.  And if, by drawing influences from
others I actually branch off and come up with something different/original,
then great.  Chances are, if you spend all your time trying to come up with
something totally original, you`ll end up with something totally shite.

I`ll stand by every one of those tracks on Map One and defend them as
utterly valid, thoughtful and release-worthy tracks.  Some of them I might
even think of as <gasp> pretty original.

Anyway, it`s nine quid for 16 tracks, so what are you moaning about? :-)

<---HEATsink--->