Re: (idm) Re: mask 2 for sale

From Steve
Sent Wed, Jan 14th 1998, 19:15

> > ACTUALLY...andy maddocks was NOT happy about the mask2 mp3's and I
> was
> > asked to get in touch with the guilty parties to express andy's
> > displeasure...and did we get anything back?? nope...
> >
> > special??..naah, just a sad ignorant individual with no respect for
> > copyright and the individuals that put in hard work to create good
> music
>
> And how about sad ignorant labels who put out records in insanely
> limited
> editions that don't even come *close* to satisfying customer demand,
> showing no respect for the individuals who would *love* to own the
> music
> in it's original format, but who couldn't find a copy upon release and
>
> don't feel like paying $200+ for a copy in auction? Hmmmmmm?

I can see the arguements from both sides.. but please everyone remember
that
often when small labels release records they do it through bank loans,
or just
dont eat very well for a few years. Even though they may be able to sell
any
records they produce, its usually the question of getting the capital
together
to actually set it going, and then theres the fact that even if you do
sell them all
you may not end up in profit. If i ran a small record label my priority
would
be the next record not represses of older titles.... so those older
titles often suffer.

Steve

/k/./F/

http://freespace.virgin.net/kung.funk/kf.htm