From thomas m weibrecht Sent Wed, Jan 14th 1998, 20:23
From thomas m weibrecht Sent Wed, Jan 14th 1998, 20:23
On Wed, 14 Jan 1998 19:11:59 +0000 "Steve /k/./F/" <xxxx.xxxx@xxxxxx.xxx> writes: >> > ACTUALLY...andy maddocks was NOT happy about the mask2 mp3's and I >> was >> > asked to get in touch with the guilty parties to express andy's >> > displeasure...and did we get anything back?? nope... >> > >> > special??..naah, just a sad ignorant individual with no respect >for >> > copyright and the individuals that put in hard work to create good >> music >> >> And how about sad ignorant labels who put out records in insanely >> limited >> editions that don't even come *close* to satisfying customer demand, >> showing no respect for the individuals who would *love* to own the >> music >> in it's original format, but who couldn't find a copy upon release >and >> >> don't feel like paying $200+ for a copy in auction? Hmmmmmm? > >I can see the arguements from both sides.. but please everyone >remember >that >often when small labels release records they do it through bank loans, >or just >dont eat very well for a few years. Even though they may be able to >sell >any >records they produce, its usually the question of getting the capital >together >to actually set it going, and then theres the fact that even if you do >sell them all >you may not end up in profit. If i ran a small record label my >priority >would >be the next record not represses of older titles.... so those older >titles often suffer. > >Steve > >/k/./F/ > >http://freespace.virgin.net/kung.funk/kf.htm > > >