Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good.

From Shane Beers
Sent Thu, Aug 6th 1998, 20:49

> >oh, im not saying i dont like the records,im just saying that i do not think
> >that she has anything to do with the releases outside of talking.
>
> but it's just a guess, right?  you don't actually know a thing about
> what went into the tracks, yeah?  this opinion actually sounds quite
> sexist to me.  as if you're automatically assuming women have no
> technical ability.  which may or may /not/ be true in this particular
> case!
>
> there is more to making the music than sticking a few patch leads in
> and clicking up a row of bars in cubase.  it's more than likely that
> gescom / disjecta gave her technical assistance to create the sounds,
> and program her arrangments in the tracks.  not just being used as a
> sample source - that's ridiculous!

what you might not have realized is that her first 10" sounds a whole damn lot
like gescom, and the second like disjecta. funny, but those people "assissted" in
the productions.

why is it that if you are a woman, you suddenly are allowed leinentcies in
everything you do? im not a sexist person. if some guy named "mark" released
records and they sounded like gescom with some guy saying "do the things that
people say you cannot " i would be saying the same thing.

mira calix is like if i was a record label honcho, and decided that i wanted to
go play around for a day with autechre. yeah, i could make some cool stuff if
they "helped" me out.

shane

and for pete's sake, women have techical ability. you damn neo-hippies and your
wanna-be politically correct mentalities.