Re: (idm) Freeform: whats the deal there? (struggling)

From robert.merlak
Sent Wed, Jan 21st 1998, 18:57

>>I don't know what are you talking about, are you really talking about
>>Freeform. Simon makes so jazzy electronica, and he is one of the
>
>I've tried and I just didn't hear any jazzy elements in his stuff, unless
>we've made jazz into an attitude instead of a genre of music.
>If you want "jazzy electronica" I advise you to pick up either the Argonort
>ep on Dot, anything by Funki Porcini or GFQ or the latest As One album on
>Mo Wax. For example. Now THERE'S Jazzy. All good.


Yeah that is jazz but Simon does really really really really jaz-jaz-jazzzy
stuff as well. (i don't do strange faces and shake my toes while
i listen to it without any reason)


>Anyway: This is somewhat of an insult, just because someone doesn't like
>Freeform (who in my ears isn't innovative at all) doesn't mean that he/she
>is a conservative, passive music listener. I've heard a lot of music
>through the years, both innovative (this isn't an universally appliciable
>thing but there are some artists or groups that we probably can agree on
>being innovative and groundbreaking, the Black Dog and Kraftwerk being two
>of em) and not, and I would most certainly put Freeform in the latter
>category. Sorry folks. It might be good music but you have to make it into
>separate things.

You are putting Kraftwerk as inovative. That's like putting L.V. Bethowen
(i don't even know how to spell it) as inovative. OK Black Dog is in
our century so it's allright. (but Kraftw..... come on).
You are promoting grandparents on the list and young people like
Simon Pykes who are the next generations of music makers, you
put them as LATTER category. Woow gee, thanks.

C'mon , swich ON.


Rob's bro.


btw i've got nothing against Kraftwek it's was just an example.