(idm) re: classical is not for stodgy old wankers!

From cardhore
Sent Tue, Feb 9th 1999, 22:36

>Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 19:54:29 EST
>From: xxxxxxxxx@xxx.xxx
>Subject: Re: (idm) re: classical (lovely)
>
>>  alright.  it is now officially my personal mission to change this.
>>  idm will not be the "new classical."  it shall be the new motown.
> 
>
>Now you can take it to a literal level, bust out with the ol' websters
>dictionary, for the simple purpose of showing off your "intellectual
>superiority", and to whom? the people on this list? to yourself? can
anything
>be more obnoxious? Such things are to be expected of mediochre minds.
But let
>me present my argument anyways, why not spare the garbage, if simply for
the
>sake of the prosperity!! If you want to nitpick trivial literacies, do
it in
>your bathtub while you masturbate where no one will ever know.
>
>Motown, how would that be interpreted in other people's minds? Idiot.

hey.  i said "it is now officially my personal mission to change this.
idm will not be the 'new classical.'  it shall be the new motown,"  and
you're bringing in dictionaries, "intellectual superiority" and my 
masturbatorial habits?  and you infer from this single statement that
my mind is "mediochre?" (sic) 

dude, this is why you need to listen to more motown.


rjck./_
armchairbeatarchitecture@: http://www.gl.umbc.edu/~nworth1

___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]