Re: (idm) bad urmur

From alan r lucas
Sent Thu, Jan 29th 1998, 02:31

On Wed, 28 Jan 1998, GamePrg. wrote:

> actually they are quite crappish.. Why is it that ppl like Mike & Richard
> can release such shit tracks if they want? I mean. I dunno what Mike thinks
> of his own Urmur Bile Trax but I think it's substandard.
> 
> 

it's funny how true that is. i can listen to urmur every once in a while,
but why the hell does the thing have to last 60+ minutes? the best tracks
are definitely the shortest. urmur bile just goes on and on... and on.
lunatic harness is soooo much better (although i still don't know what
the point of _wannabe_ is), and i think mike's best since tango. but he
can put out crap in between cause he has the mark of the trainspotter, or
something like that. i'm not trying to say that everything between tango
and lunatic is crap, but i don't think any of his stuff has a super good
listen all the way through, like autechre's stuff, which i can listen to
again and again and not have to skip tracks or look at the time.

that's all.
alan!