From Mr. Tangent Sent Mon, Feb 22nd 1999, 11:12
At 02:24 AM 2/18/99 -0500, "imx++" <xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx> encoded: >odis ON-1 wiL beeeeeuzzzzzz jeust four YOU SIR(&*!^%$(!%&*^!%(*^%! >eyem s0o0o0o0o0o x-cyted. K!!!!!! so0o0o manee wayz t0o Re:s://pond. shaL >i ch0ose awt ov daHAT da HAT dahat. ? (?) ! t'was the night before it was >inevitabullshite thAT dahat dahat daHAT sumON-1 lyke Y O U R S E L F may-ed ><timestretch> suche a coMMmmmgood-ent. nd nowe i asK, wuz th,air-french >band. anyeeee reezon u felt (smooth cloth that reminds me of 1st grade) the >nee-eed eed to poSt (i still have your copy bitch) suche a *PER _ SON _ ELL* >(dont tell mom the babysitters dead) note in teXXXt direcTed at know1 but M >Y S E L F two one zero the list.!)(%!? i reELy shood nawt miRor this (better >than that, 12" EXTREMELY LIMITED $15 (skam)) kynt ov behaveeour nd nd nd >ndndndndndnd re:ply(wood) no(reverse)on list. list. but i >die-gresssssssssssssssssssssss (fades and and comes back in to sweeter::::: > >why the fuck am i writing this. fuck it. deel. >dunlykedunreed. > >byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee::::::::::::::::luff, j* Okay, I came off extremely harsh and for the most part what I wrote before to imx++/Jeff was really unwarranted. The reason I responded to you in the first place was to illustrate, as I failed to do, that your highly elaborate style turns some people off. What I mean is that some people, as I do, fail to get any coherent sense from most of your posts - and therefor - usually delete without deciphering what you wrote. It's as if you're trying to alienate your potential "audience". Regardless, I do admire your style in a way and I apologize for the demeaning critique of your style - perhaps you should channel this obvious energy and uniqueness into creating other things? I would think that your music would be rather interesting - if it's anything like your typing style. Perhaps not many people would "get it", but it'd probably be esoteric and different nonetheless. Sorry for the intrusion. :) Mr. Tangent