Re: RS Vs Doepfer. Some FACTS

From Chris Whitten
Sent Fri, Aug 28th 1998, 23:37

>Just a little bit of foresight on RS's part and their modules could have=

been
plug and play.  They had to make the connections different so one has to
build
his own ribbon cables.  Why they did this when they know people will use
them
in Doepfer systems, who knows.  I also heard (can't verify) that even the=

screw hole positions are slightly different and you need to redrill.<

These two problems Elhardt points out are fact but his solutions are a bi=
t
off.
I agree it was silly to use a different bus cable, however RS can supply =
a
different cable which plug and plays just the same as the Doepfer one.
The hole business is a bit more annoying. I don't think it would be a goo=
d
idea to drill on your RS faceplates. You need to leave a small gap (less
than 1hp) between the RS and Doepfer modules or a friend of mine has cut
his track so he could position his screws where he wanted them.
Chris