From wells Sent Tue, Jan 27th 1998, 04:00
At 10:29 PM 1/26/98 -0500, Arthur B. Purvis wrote: > >I could be totally off the mark here, but isn't SFL the album he (in >theory, anyways) built instruments for and then immediately destroyed >them? Or am I think of some kind of destruction of master tapes after >something was recorded? > yeah, that's the one. i heard it was just one instrument, though. either way, i'd be really interesting in learning about what sort of intstrument(s) he built.. >> np. luke vibert 'big soup' (wow. this record is gooood) > > Wells, while I usually agree with you, I feel the need to say that this >album bored me to tears. I could literally not find a full two minutes of >remotely interesting/grooving music on the entire record, and I listened >to it 30-40 times (no recollection, however; I was so bored after the >first minute and a half I usually stopped paying attention by accident). i thought that the first time I heard it... but then my friend gave me his promo copy and i played it and thought it was pretty good. not my usual cup-o-tea (boy do I hate that cliche) but for some reason i like it. *shrug* >I was listening to NWW - Sylvie and Babs... when I read this email, and I >really, really, really think you should run out and buy it. yeah.. i want to pick up Thunder Perfect Mind and the Stapleton/David Tibet album 'The Sadness of Things' next.. unfortunately, a NWW obsession is a damned expensive one. toodles. : wells : : xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx.xxx :