RE: [AH] the snappiest envelope ever

From david
Sent Tue, Nov 11th 2008, 12:21

------_SmarterMail_NextPart_5808655351420770
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=0D=0A		Hmmm - A-140 specs gives total EG Duration - 50 micro is quick but =
I'd rather see separate values for A, D,S and R stages at the different swi=
tch settings personally.....=0D=0A=0D=0AThe Cwejman is another animal altog=
ether given it is a true dual module and has full CV control of all EG stag=
es as well.=0D=0A=0D=0AD.=0D=0A=0D=0A--------------------------------------=
--=0D=0A=0D=0A				From: Phil <redacted@example.com>=0D=0ASent: Tuesday, 11 Nov=
ember 2008 2:58 AM=0D=0ATo: redacted@example.com=0D=0ASubject: RE: [AH] t=
he snappiest envelope ever =0D=0A=0D=0ASo if I am right it would mean that =
the fastest setting of the A-140 would make the full envelope's duration fa=
ster than the sole attack of the Cwejman envelope ?=0D=0ADo you think this =
is plausible or could this be a mistake on the Doepfer site which should re=
ad 0,5 ms instead of 50us for the full envelope duration ?=0D=0A=0D=0A> Dat=
e: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:24:27 +0100=0D=0A> From: fanwander@mnet-online.de=0D=
=0A> To: redacted@example.com=0D=0A> CC: redacted@example.com; analogue=
@hyperreal.org=0D=0A> Subject: Re: [AH] the snappiest envelope ever=0D=0A> =
=0D=0A> David Lackey schrieb:=0D=0A> > 100 microseconds:-=0D=0A> > =0D=0A> =
> http://www.cwejman.net/cwejman.net/adsr-vc2.pdf=0D=0A> Doepfer beats this=
:=0D=0A> http://www.doepfer.de/a140.htm "The envelope duration ranges from =
about =0D=0A> 50us (microseconds) up to several minutes."=0D=0A=0D=0A______=
___________________________________________________________=0D=0AT=E9l=E9ph=
onez gratuitement =E0 tous vos proches avec Windows Live Messenger  !  T=E9=
l=E9chargez-le maintenant ! =0D=0Ahttp://www.windowslive.fr/messenger/1.asp=
=0D=0A=0D=0A

------_SmarterMail_NextPart_5808655351420770--