Re: [AH] Ho-hum...vocoders, vocoders

From toby boudreaux
Sent Thu, Jan 21st 1970, 01:00

http://seekers.co.jp/ProductsE.html


anyone know about this company?

-----Original Message-----
From: Brigman, Corley <corley.brigman@intel.com>
To: Analogue Heaven <analogue@hyperreal.org>
Date: Wednesday, June 09, 1999 6:42 PM
Subject: RE: [AH] Ho-hum...vocoders, vocoders


>
>> The NEXT! VOX-11, the MAM VF-11, and the FAT PCP330 are all the same 
>> machine. MAM is the parent, NEXT! and FAT are making the 
>> machine under license.
>> 
>> The VC-10 is lesser in quality (intelligibility) than the VF-11.
>> 
>> "The real thing"? What do you consider the real thing? An EMS 5000?
>> 
>> I also hear that the Doepfer A100 module is good. And there's 
>> the old VP330 
>> from Roland...
>
>So how do the digital boxes stack up against these? Things like
>the Boss SE-70 and the Clavia micromodular. i like the sound of
>my se70, and i wonder what's missing from it that's in things
>like the EMS boxes....
>
>corley brigman
>intel corp.
>corley.brigman@intel.com
>
>speaking for me, not for intel.