Re: Doepfer vs. MAM vocoder (was:Re: VP-330 (analog speech synthesis)/Po

From Paul Perry
Sent Tue, Aug 11th 1998, 02:11

At 04:00 PM 10/08/98 +0200,redacted@example.com wrote:
...
>Well, IMSBO (slightly biased opinion (;->) ), the problem with the doepfer
>is that you *have* to patch it together. Do you really want to *always* do
>this ?
....
>Maximum flexibillity is *one* design goal, but ergonomics is a not less
>important one. 

well this looks like an argument for a normalised vocoder analysis/synthesis
patchbay :)

paul perry melbourne australia