Re: [AH] system 100 versus 100m

From Paul Nagle
Sent Wed, Nov 9th 2005, 17:40

redacted@example.com wrote:

>However I cannot tell from the archives if the 100m sounds better than the 100 or just sounds
>different. I realize sound quality is very subjective. I think my main concern is that after
>reading the archives I get the impression that the 100 was a failure or did not sound good. I hope
>I'm making sense.
>  
>
The 100 sounded wonderful (and still does). The basic oscillators and 
filters of the 100m sounded cheap, nasal and plastic to me.

You will, of course, discover many other opinions here... :)

All the best

Paul

-- 
Paul Nagle / The Joint Intelligence Committee / Binar /  Headshock

www.BogusFocus.com / www.softroom.co.uk / www.binar.co.uk