[AH] 888 :: was WTB: Roland TR-808

From James Elliott
Sent Wed, Jan 23rd 2008, 03:34

Alright, Shag... how did you manage to score one of those crunk thumpers?????

Nova told me they haven't even received them yet! Do you have any idea when they'll be unleashed upon the masses?????




----- Original Message ----
From: Shagghie <redacted@example.com>
To: Tomislav Babic <redacted@example.com>
Cc: redacted@example.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1:33:09 PM
Subject: Re: [AH] WTB: Roland TR-808

Hi Tomislav!  How's that 2ube pre pedal treating you these days?  What
did you settle on?

Great questions below, and understandable!

I hesitate sending this link out, as I had JUST gotten back from NAMM,
was 2am, and it's a camera mic.
Oh, and there's the flying pig thing too, but... alas...


We did a 4 hour jam last night with the 888, 2 revo's, and one 777.  It
best jam ever, and that was the 888 out of the box.
I'll post that audio clip, which was multitracked into Logic 8 and
with Logic as master clock. (don't ask) to megaupload or something in a
days. I'll even let it go out unmixed, unmastered, zero compression,
b/c you have to hear the 888 in person to appreciate the sound of it.
at 44.1/16...but I have to wait until tomorrow night back in studio to
render it to .mp3 at 320kbs.  I won't be able to do the full 4 hours,
 but we
should get a decent chuck of pure 888 at that point with 100mb limit on
filesize. Will that suffice?

For some of your questions...here's my thoughts:  Were I in a position
own both 888 and 999, I would own both for certain. But I'm not.
They are two different boxes to be sure. Same construction, but way
different vibe and sound at the end of the day. I am a hacker first,
musician second..., as far as skillsets go. What I know about systems
that complexity is harder to manage and exponentially increases chances
bugs/failure, etc.  While the 999's filter section is mad-powerful, and
sounds great.. it was a layer of complexity that I didn't end up using
the studio, as I use other gear for my filter duties running off of
 sends on
a mixer. Or ITB stuff from logic 8.
So I looked at risk/reward, bang/buck ratios and found myself leaning
towards the concept of an 888. Plus, I'm smitten for 808 sound..it's by
my favorite drum machine of all ancient time.  In fact, I stumbled the
of the 888 while googling for an 808 to buy...

So, there have been bugs, just like any other boutique synth/drum
manfacture forum.  The Yahoo group, particularly for Jomox, IS the
manufacture's forum for bug reporting, and there are several
that routinely report bugs or feature requests or design decision
etc. on the forum. It is very active, and stuff gets done as time goes
In short, it's great.  The 999's OS, fwiw, at 1.3, is finally in a
where I would feel good about performing live with the box without fear
any show stopping bugs, etc. The sample uploads are smooth, easy and
with a killer little GUI ap that lets you easily manage the sound
Very bauhaus.. to the point.

I'm a big fan of both JoMoX and Elektron gear, so my input is
I'm only a fan after going through that long and winding road we much
take as individuals and musicians.  I want what sounds best, and works.
fact that we did a four hour acid jam, with rock solid timing the whole
time, with mad beats and glitch free operation of the 888, well... it
sounded best, and it worked.

I've not done a side by side with an 808.  But it's almost irrelevant
 to do
so... he's not billing it as a clone, and it doesn't use 808 parts,
But for the same reason that comparing a FR-777 to a 303 ends up always
being a pointless discussion, so too would a comparison of the 808 and
Neither is purporting to be it's original. But both go far beyond their
originals, while still doing superb jobs at 'preserving' some of what
 is the
'essence' of the original. But each is it's own instrument, with it's
sequencer, interface, and feel.

I only digress, b/c I don't want this thread to turn into a 808 vs 888
thread.  I DO however, want to encourage anyone with a limited budget
of us) to hear an 888 before deciding to buy an 808 (and vice versa, no
doubt).  They are close enough to warrant this, and they are far apart
enough to force you to choose a route based on YOUR music, your ears
 and the
degree to which either of them gives you a bone chromer.

For my part... and that of our label, we've made the executive decision
go with the 8's, and so we had to sell the 9's for now.  The 888 can
 also do
decent 909 kicks, with the right amount of noise dialed in.

if you are a sucker for 808 kicks, and bouncing metal high hats that
around your head like pixie dust... then the 888 cannot be topped here
earth... I'll say that with as much conviction as can be conveyed on a
mailing list. And that's after just two nights with it.

I'll post the jam in the next few days... if that doesn't display the
properly, nothing would. :)

On Jan 22, 2008 10:56 AM, Tomislav Babic <redacted@example.com>

> so.. im confused now, Shag... i was reading your recent praise of 999
> much
> interest as it seems to get mixed reviews, due to bugs etc.. and
> 999 was
> your be-all, end-all drum machine. your posts kinda renewed my
 interest in
> it..
> and now.. your full of praise for 888..   which is 999 wihtout a
> hmmm,,,,
> could you clarify pls.. what they are good/best for, respectively..
> and whats with them bugs reports .. that jomox yahoo group is full
> fwiw, i still havent heard a mp3 of 999/888 that thumps anyware near
> 808/909..
> u got some? or an URL of someone doing a decent representations..?
> thanks
> best regards
> Tom
> --
> ---
> Tomislav Babic
> www.babic.com - studio, mp3, info
> redacted@example.com

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ