From John Papiewski
Sent Thu, Jan 1st 1970, 01:00
> The makes that I count as 'real' are the following: Serge Moog CE Synthesis Technology Modcan Doepfer Wiard PAIA CMS Technosaurus I hadn't heard of Analogue Systems before, but it sounds like they qualify also. They all sell systems where the customer specifies the modules. The modules are electrically independent and patchable. These are ALL very small outfits. Some with a few people, some with only one. I would hazard a guess that company-wise, Doepfer is the biggest. I would imagine that if the economy nosedives, several would unfortunately bite the dust, if not all. I want to restate my earlier point about reviews with low bias and low drool factor. Seems like what I've read either online or in print has had too much of either. Is it possible to review systems in a critical way, without butt-slamming other makes? Like a cool-headed Consumer Reports style. Maybe a general format would be: * Extensive sound demos (which is why CD might be preferable to downloaded snippets). Little or no use of effects - let's hear the synth, not the effects box. * General description * Company background * Module list with thorough descriptions, spec's, parameters * Lists of features the reviewer likes, dislikes * Pictures * Pricing info * Availability, turnaround time * Used market data I put up the EGRES site as a source of information on Serge. I've tried to keep my biases and drool to a minimum - or at least put them in their place. I'm thinking that it would be a Good Thing to expand this approach to other makes, but I personally don't have that much experience outside Serge, so I'm not qualified to comment too much. John P.