RE: [AH] the snappiest envelope ever

From Phil a
Sent Tue, Nov 11th 2008, 11:57

--_c763b390-4a92-47f1-97d2-4862928367de_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


So if I am right it would mean that the fastest setting of the A-140 would =
make the full envelope's duration faster than the sole attack of the Cwejma=
n envelope ?
Do you think this is plausible or could this be a mistake on the Doepfer si=
te which should read 0=2C5 ms instead of 50us for the full envelope duratio=
n ?




> Date: Tue=2C 11 Nov 2008 10:24:27 +0100
> From: fanwander@mnet-online.de
> To: redacted@example.com
> CC: redacted@example.com=3B redacted@example.com
> Subject: Re: [AH] the snappiest envelope ever
>=20
> David Lackey schrieb:
> > 		100 microseconds:-
> >=20
> > http://www.cwejman.net/cwejman.net/adsr-vc2.pdf
> Doepfer beats this:
> http://www.doepfer.de/a140.htm "The envelope duration ranges from about=20
> 50us (microseconds) up to several minutes."

_________________________________________________________________
T=E9l=E9phonez gratuitement =E0 tous vos proches avec Windows Live Messenge=
r=A0 !=A0 T=E9l=E9chargez-le maintenant !=A0
http://www.windowslive.fr/messenger/1.asp=

--_c763b390-4a92-47f1-97d2-4862928367de_--